Reach policymakers and AI governance professionals by publishing with AI Policy Bulletin. We help you turn your insights into action-oriented pieces that decision-makers actually read.

What is an AI Policy Bulletin piece?

We publish short articles that help policymakers understand and respond to developments in artificial intelligence.

Our focus is on how to govern advanced and general-purpose AI systems. We put good ideas in front of policymakers to help them navigate both near-term developments in AI capabilities, and AI's longer-term transformative potential.

We are editorially neutral and publish authors from across the political spectrum and across AI governance debates.

An AI Policy Bulletin piece usually does one of two things:

1. Shape how policymakers think about AI issues. Such pieces often explain where frontier AI is headed in the coming months; identify the likely decision points policymakers will face; and recommend a broad strategic direction for given actors.
2. Inform decisions on live policy questions. Such pieces often focus on a topical AI issue and often provide concrete recommendations for named policy actors.

If you’re unsure whether your piece fits this framing, please reach out.

What we don’t publish

• Research summaries with no policy implications
• Articles that propose an idealized policy solution without reference to political considerations, implementation capacity, or other likely objections.
• Articles focused solely on corporate governance or primarily targeted at private sector actors.
• Articles written solely or mostly by AI models.

Why write for us?

We help you by providing:

• ‍Peer review: Every piece is reviewed by at least one person in our network of AI governance experts and practitioners. They provide substantive feedback on content, argument strength, and policy relevance.
• Audience: We have over 1300 subscribers with a readership in international institutions, governments, think tanks and top universities.
• Editorial Support: We help you communicate your ideas in the most actionable and policy-relevant way.

What topics are we looking for?

We would be particularly excited to receive pitches on any of the following topics. This list was last updated on 5 August 2026. 

‍US frontier AI policy

• Will security concerns lead to a slow-down in frontier AI development? What would that look like in practice?
• What should federal frontier AI legislation involve?
• Who should be evaluating frontier AI and how?
• How should we govern AI companies’ internal deployment of their own models?
• What happens if the Trump administration continues with an Executive Order-driven approach to AI governance?
• What are the economic implications if frontier models can't be widely released?
• Will electricity overtake chips as the binding constraint on frontier AI development?
• How will domestic politics around data centers affect the growth of AI capabilities?

‍AI middle powers (including the UK and EU)

• How can middle powers maintain access to frontier AI models and influence over their development?
• How can middle powers actually work together, and for what objectives?
• How should the EU use its AI Act enforcement powers?
• How can countries use their AISIs strategically?
• Should middle powers invest in alternative AI paradigms?

‍International security

• What does a ‘Mythos moment’ for AI-bio risk look like?
• Will the US or China restrict the release of powerful open-weight models?
• What should US-China negotiations on frontier AI focus on?
• If the Global South adopts Chinese models, what will this mean for the West?
• Will AI undermine nuclear deterrence? 

‍Other issues

• What are the most likely stories of AI-driven power concentration?
• When will automation unemployment really start to bite?
• When will AI accelerate robotics, and what will be the implications?

How to submit a pitch

We welcome pitches (1-3 paragraphs) on various topics related to AI policy.

Your pitch should include a strong, clear, and evidence-based argument and enough detail that we can understand the direction of your piece. When considering pitches, we also assess your relevant expertise and track record.

A pitch that gets us excited answers:

• What is your core argument?
• What evidence will you use to support your argument?
• Who is your audience, and why do they need to hear this right now?
• What is the 'so what' for your audience? What should they do after reading your piece?
• How does your expertise connect to this piece, from the readers’ perspective?

The primary reader of the AI Policy Bulletin is a current or future decision-maker who will be in a position to influence the governance of transformative AI. As these professionals are likely to be highly attention-constrained, we are looking for succinct and engaging pieces that are between 700-1000 words long.